7 travel fashion trends that should be banned

We’ve all heard the phrase “crime against fashion” used in reference to one’s sartorial sins.

But one New Jersey town has actually made a certain style a punishable offense –- low-hanging pants.

According to local news reports, beach town Wildwood recently passed a law banning people from wearing pants and shorts that hang more than 3 inches below the hips on the boardwalk.

In other words, keep your bums covered, kids. 

Mayor Ernest Trojano says the town has received multiple complaints from families about too many people with their butts or briefs hanging out.

Offenders will be fined $25-100. Repeat offenders given community service. 

Yet if hip hop chic is a no-no, it's somewhat less clear why some of the following missteps have established themselves as acceptable travel accoutrements over the years.

Here are seven other travel fashion crimes we think should be banned.            

1. Thai fisherman’s pants

Unless you're chopping sushi or pregnant, leave these at home.What: Lightweight cotton unisex pants made wide in the waist so can be worn by anyone.

Come in many different colors and patterns ranging from plain black (almost, but not, forgivable) to luminous orange and tie-dye.

Not worn by Thai fishermen.

Who wears them: Mainly the preserve of Israelis and impressionable young British backpackers and most prevalent on the party islands of southern Thailand.

For prime fisherman’s pant-spotting, head to a beach bar after nightfall where you're guaranteed to find young girls and blokes with ratty beards twirling fire sticks to interchangeable Euro techno.

Redeeming feature? Excellent joke material for future years if any of your friends fall into the trap of wearing a pair.

2. Socks and sandals

Not even buckles can contain the hideousness of the socks/sandal combo.What: Self-explanatory. The wholly ill-advised pairing of a pair of socks (usually white, but often brown, black or even flesh-colored) with a chunky pair of sensible sandals with ample strapping.

Who wears them: Once the preferred footwear of elderly Brits uncertain of what to do with their feet in warmer climes, this unholy combo has inexplicably wormed its way into favor with fashion experts who are quite clearly having a laugh at our expense.

It’s true that bare feet aren’t the most attractive item in the anatomical arsenal, but they generally look far better in sandals -- the jury’s out on them too, by the way -- when unclad.

Redeeming feature? Reduces the likelihood of ant or mosquito attacks making your feet even more ugly.

3. Bad travel tattoos

Maybe you should have gone with the rose on the ankle.What: Love them or hate them, it’s hard to deny the merits of a really good tattoo.

These designs, however, are generally painstakingly planned and executed by expert artists, not hatched at the tail end of a vodka bucket and branded indelibly onto your person in a hut by an off-duty fisherman.

It’s the second variety we are talking about here.

Who gets them: Travelers who get most inebriated, so Australians, Irish and Brits. Many Americans, too, seem to have a gene that makes them susceptible to vandalizing their body with unintelligible Oriental scrawls and badly rendered dragons when traveling Asia. 

Redeeming feature? You’ll never forget that night you forgot the following morning.

4. Slogan T-shirts

Slogan shirts come in all styles and colors. That doesn't mean you should buy one. What: Let’s be fair -- some of the classic travel tees are actually pretty natty. Beer Lao is a fine beverage and its label looks pretty cool emblazoned on cotton.

Mostly, however, this fashion niche -- most prevalent on the southeast Asian circuit -- is an exercise in depressing uniformity.

Getting inebriated in a tube on a river in Vang Vieng in Laos may have been riotous but does it really have to be commemorated ad nauseum on your chest? 

Also, it’s not being overly judgemental to say that anyone who still thinks the slogan "same, same but different" still has mileage for humor should probably be avoided.

Who wears them? A young person’s game, which is understandable given that a) the items are cheap and durable and b) baby backpackers tend to hunt in packs and can be forgiven for being swept up in the excitement of being away from home for an extended period for the first time. 

Redeeming feature? Good way of striking up a conversation with the opposite sex. "Ah, so I see you’ve been tubing in Vang Vieng. Awesome." Or "Ah, Beer Chang, eh? Isn’t Thailand awesome." 

5. Crocs

Unless you're under the age of 10, leave the Crocs at home.What: Similar to Thai fisherman’s pants, in that they are the ultimate example of what happens when practicality supersedes normal boundaries of taste, these garish foam clogs are rightly reviled.

Ugly in every way, it’s a well-established fact that it's impossible for anyone to look good, even acceptable, in Crocs.

Proponents would have it that their hideousness is outweighed by comfort, but babygros are comfy, too. You don’t feel the need to parade around in them, do you?

Who wears them? Crocs, thankfully, have been shunned by most of the world leaving it up to mostly middle-aged North American men to spread the tarnished gospel.

Fittingly, born again Christian and former president of the United States, George W. Bush, was known for his penchant for Crocs. Paired with socks. Also popular among Eastern European and Russian men -– a demographic not generally held to be the most fashion forward.

Redeeming feature? This 2002 invention can be used in the future as an example of post-millennial trauma.